doi: 10.5455/mjhs.2021.01.004
Original Article
A cross-sectional study of the predisposition to anxiety during pregnancy in Saudi Arabia: magnitude and risk factors
1Najran University, Saudi Arabia - Najran - King Abdulaziz Road P.O Box 1988
Abstract
Background and Aim: Under normal circumstances, pregnancy is a somewhat stressful condition, but for women who are prone to anxiety, it can be more complex. The objectives of this study were to identify the magnitude of anxiety among pregnant women attending the Najran Maternity & Children's Hospital (Najran City, Saudi Arabia) and to examine the correlates that may play a role in the development of anxiety during pregnancy. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at Najran Maternity & Children's Hospital. Data were collected from 410 women through questionnaire-based inter- views to gather psycho-sociodemographic, medical and gestational data. The screening of anxiety was scaled by the generalized anxiety disorder-7 (GAD- 7) scale. Results: A total of 410 pregnant women participated in this study. In total, 11% of the participants suffered from anxiety during pregnancy. Multivariate regression analysis showed psychiatric illness and feeling of being stressed were significant correlates of anxiety during pregnancy. Conclusions: The anxiety disorder during pregnancy is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Thus, the proper antenatal care to identify and manage anxiety among pregnant women might benefit the psychological and physical health of pregnant women, their children, and families. It is necessary to consider all possible various biopsychosocial factors that account for anxiety occurrence during pregnancy.
Keywords Anxiety · pregnancy · screening · antenatal care · prevalence
- INTRODUCTION
Under normal circumstances, pregnancy is a somewhat stressful condition, but for women who are prone to anxiety, it can be more complex. In general, approximately 21% of pregnant women have clinically significant symptoms of anxiety [1]. Local studies have shown that the prevalence of anxiety during pregnancy ranges from 23.6% to 30%[2,3].
Anxiety during pregnancy is a predictor of adverse maternal and child outcomes.[4]
Anxiety during pregnancy is associated with a variety of maternal consequences including increased number of irrational visits to health services, severe nausea and vomiting, pre-eclampsia, spontaneous preterm labor, unnecessary elective cesarean section, a more difficult labor and delivery with an increased risk of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms related to birth.[5] Moreover, there are consequences of anxiety during pregnancy for the child including preterm birth, low birth weight, admission to neonatal intensive care and difficulties in receiving proper care after delivery[1]. The effects of anxiety during pregnancy on the health of the child are serious and long-term, including adverse biological, mental, and behavioral effects[6].
Biological changes during pregnancy might explain such emotional instabilities. However, psychosocial, medical, and antenatal care factors may play a role in the development of anxiety during pregnancy.
Correlational studies have shown significant associations between anxiety during pregnancy and low level of education, unemployment, unplanned pregnancy, no family support, no or low income, negative life events, multiparity, history of miscarriage, a history of depression, chronic disease and gestational diabetes [2,3,7].
Taking into account the seriousness of the pregnancy period, we have assessed our practice to a establish comprehensive care model for pregnant women either by prevention of anxiety or early detection to ensure better pregnancy outcomes.
- OBJECTIVES
To identify the magnitude of anxiety among pregnant women attending the Najran Maternity & Children’s Hospital (Najran City, Saudi Arabia) and to examine the correlates that may play a role in the development of anxiety during pregnancy.
- METHODS
This cross-sectional study was conducted at Najran Maternity & Children’s Hospital, which provides the majority of antenatal care in Najran City, in southwestern Saudi Arabia, from June to August 2017. Using simple random sampling, 410 women were recruited from the study population consisting of all pregnant women attending the antenatal clinic (ANC) during the study period and provided verbal consent to participate in the study. The screening of anxiety was scaled by the generalized anxiety disorder-7 (GAD-7) scale. This is the most extensively validated screening tool used to measure the severity of GAD, with a score of 10 or more having good diagnostic sensitivity and specificity. This scale was created by Spitzer et al., with an educational grant from Pfizer Inc[8]. The Arabic translation was downloadable from patient health questionnaire (PHQ) screeners website (https://www.phqscreeners.com/select-screener/41); no permission is required to reproduce, translate, display or distribute this information. The scale consists of seven items and total scores range from 0 to 21. A score of 10 or greater is the cutoff for screening of anxiety and further evaluation is recommended [8].
While dependent variable is anxiety symptoms among pregnant women , and independent variables are all the psycho-sociodemographic, medical, gestational characteristics (age, nationality, educational status, occupation, history of psychiatric illness, family support, level of family support, feeling of being stressed, stress control, medical illnesses, medications, parity, cesarean section, miscarriage, gestational age, risk categories, family planning, antenatal follow up, number of visits, antenatal care provider, and antenatal care place). All data were obtained through questionnaire-based interviews.
The study was conducted with the approval of the Research Ethics Committee of Najran University Faculty of Medicine. Participant confidentiality was ensured for the purposes of the study.
The statistical analysis program (SPSS v.21) was been used in the study in data entry and analysis, with the use of necessary statistical methods to achieve the objectives of the study. The following statistical methods were used: Frequencies & Percentages: which is used for describing personal data for the study sample. Mean: to identify the level for the generalized anxiety disorder-7 (GAD-7) scale. Standard Deviation: shows how much variation or dispersion exists from the average (mean). Chi-Squared Test: to test differences in the distribution of responses to questions. T-test for independent samples: To test the presence of statistically significant difference in the anxiety level among pregnant women attending antenatal clinic according to nationality and occupation. Analysis of Variance- ANOVA: To test for the presence of statistically significant difference in the anxiety level among pregnant women attending antenatal clinic according to age and education level. P-value ≤0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.
- RESULTS
In total, 410 pregnant women have participated in the study with a 100% response rate in direct interviews. The psycho-sociodemographic characteristics of the participants are shown in Table 1. The majority (69%) of the participants in this study were aged between 20 and 35 years and 88% were Saudi. Among the participants, 62% were educated to secondary level or below. Approximately 1.2 % of pregnant women were diagnosed with a psychiatric disease. During pregnancy; 9% of the participants had feeling of being stressed, which most of them (73%)were under control. The medical characteristics of participants are shown in Table 2.
| Table 1. Psycho-sociodemographic characteristics of participants | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Demographic/psychosocial data | No. | % | |
| Age (years) | <20 | 23 | 5.6 |
| 20–35 | 283 | 69.0 | |
| >35 | 104 | 25.4 | |
| Nationality | Saudi | 363 | 88.5 |
| Non-Saudi | 47 | 11.5 | |
| Education level | Illiterate | 44 | 10.7 |
| Primary | 86 | 21.0 | |
| Pre-university | 125 | 30.5 | |
| University | 121 | 29.5 | |
| Postgraduate | 34 | 8.3 | |
| Occupation | Yes | 87 | 21.2 |
| No | 323 | 78.8 | |
| History of psychiatric illness | No | 405 | 98.8% |
| Yes | 5 | 1.2% | |
| Family support | Yes | 397 | 96.8% |
| No | 13 | 3.2% | |
| Level of family support (n = 403)(self-perceived) | Satisfied | 393 | 95.9% |
| Not satisfied | 17 | 4.1% | |
| Feeling of being stressed | No | 373 | 91.0% |
| Yes | 37 | 9.0% | |
| Stress control, (n = 37) | Under control | 27 | 73.0% |
| Out of control | 10 | 27.0% | |
| Table 2. Medical characteristics of participants | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Medical data | No. | % | |
| Medical illnessess | No illness | 307 | 74.9 |
| DM | 12 | 2.9 | |
| HTN | 13 | 3.2 | |
| DVT | 7 | 1.7 | |
| Hypothyroidism | 19 | 4.6 | |
| Anemia | 27 | 6.6 | |
| Other | 25 | 6.1 | |
| Medications history | No | 336 | 82.0 |
| Yes | 74 | 18.0 | |
The gestational characteristics of participants are shown in Table 3. The majority (76.8%) of our participants were multiparous and 66% had no history of cesarean section. More than half of participants had planned for the preganancy and they were in the third trimester. Of the participants, 78% received regular follow-up during antenatal visits with 57% receiving follow-up health care from multiple providers.
| Table 3. Gestational characteristics of participants | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gestational data | No. | % | |
| Parity | Nulli-parous | 95 | 23.2 |
| Para-4 or less | 224 | 54.6 | |
| Para-5 or more | 91 | 22.2 | |
| Cesarean section | No | 271 | 66.1 |
| One | 81 | 19.8 | |
| Two or more | 58 | 14.1 | |
| Miscarriage | No | 248 | 60.5 |
| ≤2 | 140 | 34.1 | |
| ≥3 | 22 | 5.4 | |
| Gestational age | 1st trimester | 37 | 9.0 |
| 2nd trimester | 134 | 32.7 | |
| 3rd trimester | 239 | 58.3 | |
| Risk category | Low risk | 355 | 86.6 |
| High risk | 55 | 13.4 | |
| Family planning | Planned | 211 | 51.5 |
| Unplanned | 199 | 48.5 | |
| Antenatal follow-up | Regular | 320 | 78.0 |
| Irregular | 90 | 22.0 | |
| Number of visits | 1–4 | 159 | 38.7 |
| 5–11 | 251 | 61.3 | |
| Antenatal care provider | One | 176 | 42.9 |
| Multiple | 234 | 57.1 | |
| Antenatal care place | PHC | 25 | 6.1 |
| Maternity hospital | 150 | 36.6 | |
| Private sector | 2 | 0.5 | |
| Mixed | 233 | 56.8 | |
Out of total participants, about 11% of pregnant women have positive symptoms for anxiety during pregnancy. The results of multivariate regression analysis predicting the correlates that have a role to play in the development of anxiety during pregnancy from the psycho-sociodemographic, gestational and medical variables are shown in Table 6. Where the results of Logistic regression analysis revealed that feeling of being stressed significantly increased the odds ratio of anxiety during pregnancy (P = 0.002). History of psychiatric illness also significantly increased the odds ratio of anxiety during pregnancy (P = 0.01).
Table 4. shows that the mean of anxiety among pregnant women attending antenatal clinic (ANC), according to the generalized anxiety disorder-7 (GAD-7) scale is (4.31 of 21). According to this scale, anxiety among pregnant women attending antenatal clinic is of mild anxiety.
Table (4): shows the mean of anxiety symptoms among pregnant women attending antenatal clinic (ANC), according to the generalized anxiety disorder-7.
| Over the past two weeks, have you had the following problems | Never | A few days | More than half the days | Almost every day | Total Score | Mean | Std.Dev | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feeling nervous, anxious, or on edge | # | 180 | 158 | 42 | 30 | 332 | .81 | .894 |
| % | 43.9 | 38.5 | 10.2 | 7.3 | ||||
| Not being able to stop or control worrying | # | 287 | 78 | 30 | 15 | 183 | .45 | .784 |
| % | 70 | 19 | 7.3 | 3.7 | ||||
| Worrying too much about different things | # | 249 | 103 | 36 | 22 | 241 | .59 | .861 |
| % | 60.7 | 25.1 | 8.8 | 5.4 | ||||
| Trouble relaxing | # | 235 | 118 | 34 | 23 | 255 | .62 | .860 |
| % | 57.3 | 28.8 | 8.3 | 5.6 | ||||
| Being so restless that it's hard to sit still | # | 270 | 95 | 30 | 15 | 200 | .49 | .786 |
| % | 65.9 | 23.2 | 7.3 | 3.7 | ||||
| Becoming easily annoyed or irritable | # | 160 | 138 | 66 | 46 | 408 | 1.00 | 1.001 |
| % | 39 | 33.7 | 16.1 | 11.2 | ||||
| Feeling afraid as if something awful might happen | # | 305 | 72 | 23 | 10 | 148 | .36 | .700 |
| % | 74.4 | 17.6 | 5.6 | 2.4 | ||||
| Total Score | 1767 | 4.31 | 4.218 |
Table 5. shows the distribution of pregnant women according to their anxiety symptoms, the vast majority 88.5 % of pregnant women don't suffer from anxiety, while11.5% suffer from anxiety.
Table (5): shows the distribution of pregnant women according to anxiety
| Anxiety | Frequency | Percent | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don't suffer from anxiety | 363 | 88.5 | .000 |
| Suffer from anxiety | 47 | 11.5 | |
| Total | 410 | 100.0 |
| Table (6): Odds ratio (Confidence inrval) for the correlates that have a role to play in the development of anxiety during pregnancy from the psycho-sociodemographic, gestational, and medical variables | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | Odds Ratio | 95% C.I.) | P-value | |
| Lower | Upper | |||
| Age | 1.270 | .701 | 2.302 | .430 |
| Nationality | .879 | .322 | 2.398 | .801 |
| Education level | .858 | .632 | 1.164 | .325 |
| Occupation | .670 | .294 | 1.529 | .342 |
| History of psychiatric illness | 13.004 | 1.843 | 91.767 | .010 |
| Family support | 2.943 | .251 | 34.459 | .390 |
| Level of support (self -perceived) | .370 | .041 | 3.316 | .374 |
| Feeling of being stressed | 50.096 | 4.303 | 583.254 | .002 |
| Stress control, | .210 | .032 | 1.368 | .103 |
| Medical history | 1.106 | .912 | 1.343 | .306 |
| Medications history | 1.692 | .644 | 4.446 | .286 |
| Parity | 1.002 | .555 | 1.809 | .994 |
| Cesarean section | 1.400 | .890 | 2.204 | .146 |
| Miscarriage | .987 | .540 | 1.805 | .967 |
| Gestational age | .880 | .412 | 1.880 | .742 |
| Risk categories | 1.729 | .713 | 4.195 | .226 |
| Family planning | 1.154 | .559 | 2.379 | .699 |
| Antenatal care | 1.719 | .540 | 5.474 | .359 |
| Number of visits | 1.022 | .816 | 1.280 | .850 |
| health provider | .295 | .027 | 3.196 | .315 |
| Place of care | 1.935 | .624 | 5.999 | .253 |
CI – Confidence Interval. *Significant at p-≤0.05.
- DISCUSSION
It is not unusual for a pregnant woman to be anxiouse about her and baby's health within normal coping capacity. However,untreated maternal anxiety during pregnancy may lead to negative obstetrical outcomes, postpartum effects, and impact on family health as well as the child.[9] The study to uncover how much the magnitude of the anxiety among pregnant women attending the Najran Maternity & Children’s Hospital and what the correlates that may play a role in the development of anxiety during pregnancy.
It is found that around 11% of pregnant women (n-410) have positive symptoms of anxiety and further evaluation is recommended. This figure is not consistent with the fact that one-third of the general population is affected by an anxiety disorder during their lifetime, the majority are women and particularly during midlife.[10] If we assume pregnancy is extra-stressor; so this percentage should increase during pregnancy. In a similar study conducted in Singapore, 12.5% of pregnant women had anxiety [11]. In contrast, a study in China identified anxiety in 20.6% of participants.[12] Furthermore, a study in urban South Africa showed a prevalence of anxiety disorders of 23% [13]. Another study in Brazil showed a high incidence (58.5%) of anxiety among pregnant women [14]. Moreover, a similar study conducted in Brazil showed 26.8% of participants suffered from anxiety [15]. A study conducted at the University Hospital of Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University in Saudi Arabia showed 23.6% of participants experienced anxiety during pregnancy.[2]
This variation in the prevalence of anxiety during pregnancy suggests the role of cultural background in an assessment of the psychological aspect of individuals. Problematically for identify the symptoms of prenatal anxiety, may be mistaken as normal changes of pregnancy. Even though mental health has advanced in recent times in neurobiology and psychopharmacology, but still its roots are in a sociological perspective. It is because the symptoms of mental illness are only expressed in a social context. Therefore; it is a necessity to realize that visualizing anxiety disorder is not exclusively biological and that there are various biopsychosocial factors that account for anxiety occurrence.[16]
Although people differ in their definition of stressor, it is clear that there is a strong link between serious or long-lasting stress and the presence of anxiety symptoms during pregnancy. Where current studies suggest that prenatal stress is associated with preterm birth, low birth weight, and peripartum anxiety.[17] The study revealed that the odds of pregnant women who feel of being stressed to get anxiety are 50 times. Despite, the effects of stress on pregnancy are not well understood; certain stress-related hormones may play a role in causing certain pregnancy complications (e.g. high blood pressure, decrease immunity competency, and mental health). Therefore, reduce stress among pregnant women might benefit the psychological and physical health of mother and baby.[17]
we also noted a strong association between prenatal anxiety symptoms and a history of psychiatric illness; odds antenatal anxiety was 13 times greater in those who have a positive history of psychiatric illness compared to those who have a negative history of psychiatric illness. Usually, anxiety disorders exhibit comorbidity with other Axis I diagnoses and this coexisting may be common in the pregnancy as well.[18] This agrees with a study conducted in Malaysia, where concluded that a positive history of mental illness and depressive comorbidity associated factors with antenatal anxiety.[19]
Based on the sound clinical and social context; the study hypothesized that young age, providing satisfied family support, planned conceive, regular antenatal follow up, and free of medical illnesses might play a good role to prevent or minimize anxiety during pregnancy. Despite this may make a further explanation of the low prevalence of antenatal anxiety in the study, but we could not prove it or reject it statistically. A similar study was conducted at King Fahd University Hospital, in Al-Khobar city revealed that anxiety was higher among pregnant women with an unplanned pregnancy, recurrent miscarriage, and unemployment.[2] Moreover, one more study conducted in 2016 by King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC) in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia showed pregnant Saudi women with no or low income, chronic disease, no family support reported high levels of stress.[3]
Hence, we conclude that anxiety disorder during pregnancy is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Thus, the proper antenatal care to identify and manage anxiety among pregnant women might benefit the psychological and physical health of pregnant women and their infants.[20] Comprehensively; it is necessary to consider all possible various biopsychosocial factors that account for anxiety occurrence during pregnancy.
.
- Acknowledgments:
We thank all the medical interns for helping with the data collection. Also, we thank all staff at the antenatal care clinics for facilitating the data collection. We thank eScienta (www.escienta.com) for English language editing.
- Competing interests:
The author declares no competing interests.
- Funding:
Self-funding by researchers
- Contribution statetment:
Majed alshahrani and Nasser Alqahtani conceived of the presented idea and introduction. Majed alshahrani developed the theory and performed the computations. Nasser Alqahtani verified the analytical methods. All authors discussed the results and contributed to the final manuscript
- Ethical approval:
This study was conducted with the approval of the Research Ethics Committee of Najran University Faculty of Medicine. Participant confidentiality was ensured for the purposes of the study.
- REFERENCES
- Anniverno R, Bramante A, Mencacci C, Durbano F. Anxiety Disorders in Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period New Insights into Anxiety Disorders, Federico Durbano, IntechOpen. http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/52786
- Alqahtani AH, Al Khedair K, Al-Jeheiman R, Al-Turki HA, Al Qahtani NH. Anxiety and depression during pregnancy in women attending clinics in a University Hospital in Eastern province of Saudi Arabia: prevalence and associated factors. Int J Womens Health. 2018;10:101–108. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S153273. eCollection 2018
- Ahmed AE, Albalawi AN, Alshehri AA, AlBlaihed RM, Alsalamah MA. Stress and its predictors in pregnant women: a study in Saudi Arabia. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2017;10:97–102. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S131474
- Dunkel Schetter C, Tanner L. Anxiety, depression and stress in pregnancy: implications for mothers, children, research, and practice. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2012;25(2):141‐148. doi:10.1097/YCO.0b013e3283503680
- Anniverno, Roberta et al. “Anxiety Disorders in Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period.” (2013). doi: 10.5772/52786
- Shahhosseini Z, Pourasghar M, Khalilian A, Salehi F. A Review of the Effects of Anxiety During Pregnancy on Children's Health. Mater Sociomed 2015;27(3):200–202. doi:10.5455/msm.2015.27.200-202
- Van de Loo KFE, Vlenterie R, Nikkels SJ, Merkus PJFM, Roukema J, Verhaak CM, et al. Depression and anxiety during pregnancy: The influence of maternal characteristics. Birth 2018;45(4):478–489.
- Locke AB, Kirst N, Shultz CG. Diagnosis and management of generalized anxiety disorder and panic disorder in adults. Am Fam Physician 2015;91(9):617–624.
- Thea Moore, Jennifer Pytlarz; Untreated psychiatric disorder in pregnancy: Weighing the risks. Mental Health Clinician 1 August 2013; 3 (2): 83–87. doi: https://doi.org/10.9740/mhc.n163635
- Bandelow B, Michaelis S. Epidemiology of anxiety disorders in the 21st century. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2015;17(3):327‐335.
- Thiagayson P, Krishnaswamy G, Lim ML, Sung SC, Haley CL, Funf DSS, et al. Depression and anxiety in Singaporean high-risk pregnancies-prevalence and screening. Gen. Hosp. Psychiatry 2013;35:112–117.
- Kang Y, Yao Y, Dou J, Guo X, Li S–Y, Zhao C–N, et al. Prevalence and Risk Factors of Maternal Anxiety in Late Pregnancy in China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016;13:468; doi:10.3390/ijerph13050468
- van Heyningen T, Honikman S, Myer L, Onah MN, Field S, Tomlinson M. Prevalence and predictors of anxiety disorders amongst low-income pregnant women in urban South Africa: a cross-sectional study. Arch Womens Ment Health 2017;20:765–775. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-017-0768-z
- Ferreira CR, Orsini MC, Vieira CR, do Amarante Paffaro AM. Prevalence of anxiety symptoms and depression in the third gestational trimester. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2015;291:999–1003. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-014-3508-x
- Silva MMJ, Nogueira DA, Clapis MJ, Leite EPRC. Anxiety in pregnancy: prevalence and associated factors. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2017;51:e03253. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1980-220X2016048003253
- Avasthi A. Are social theories still relevant in current psychiatric practice?. Indian J Soc Psychiatry 2016;32:3-9 . DOI: 10.4103/0971-9962.176685
- Elizabeth R. Burns, Sherry L. Farr, Penelope P. Howards, Stressful Life Events Experienced by Women in the Year Before Their Infants' Births — United States, 2000–2010, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC, March 13, 2015 / 64(09);247-251
- Güler Ö, Kaya V, Gezginç K, et al. Pregnancy-Onset Panic Disorder: Incidence, Comorbidity and Associated Factors. Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2015;52(3):216‐220. doi:10.5152/npa.2015.7565
- Fadzil A, Balakrishnan K, Razali R, et al. Risk factors for depression and anxiety among pregnant women in Hospital Tuanku Bainun, Ipoh, Malaysia. Asia Pac Psychiatry. 2013;5 Suppl 1:7‐13. doi:10.1111/appy.12036
- Biaggi A, Conroy S, Pawlby S, Pariante CM. Identifying the women at risk of antenatal anxiety and depression: A systematic review. J Affect Disord. 2016;191:62–77. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.11.014.