Majmaah Journal of Health Sciences
ISSN 1658-645X (print) · 1658-8223 (online)
Vol. 9 (4)
doi: 10.5455/mjhs.2021.04.004

Original Article

Depression, Anxiety, And Insomnia Among Health Practitioners During Covid-19 Pandemic In Taif, Saudi Arabia

Anas Ibn Auf1,*, Ibrahim Alghamdi2, Hosam Hasan2, Abdul-Aziz Alghailani2

1Consultant Psychiatrist, Mental Health Hospital, Taif, Saudi Arabia · 2Mental Health Hospital, Taif, Saudi Arabia

Received 2021-06-25 · Published 2021 · pp. 26-40

Abstract

Background and Aims: Health practitioners are facing stressful situations during COVID-19 outbreak which may affect their mental health. This study aimed to assess depression, anxiety, and insomnia among health practitioners and possible risk factors during COVID-19 outbreak in Taif, Saudi Arabia. Methods: A cross-sectional study was done among health practitioners in Taif governorate from April to June 2020, using online questionnaires including: the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), the 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) scale, the 7-item Insomnia Severity Index (ISI). Results: Total number of participants was 804; of them, 541 (67.4%) were males and 64.3% were Saudi. The mean age of study participants was 36.7 years (SD ±8.27). The majority were nurses (48.1%) followed by doc- tors (21.9%). Among all participants, the prevalence of ‘significant’ depression, GAD, and insomnia was 31.1%, 19.1%, and 15.6% respectively. Proportions were much higher when including those who have even mild symptoms; and they were 58%, 44.1%, and 43.7%, respectively. Female gender, being Saudi, younger age and direct contact with COVID-19 patients were the main risk factors for psychiatric disorders investigated, while having children and age ≥40 years were protecting factors. Conclusions: High rates of mental health problems among health practitioners were found which require immediate intervention to protect, support and treat those in need. Mental health research among this special group is recommended.

Keywords Coronavirus · COVID-19 · Health personnel · Mental Health · Saudi Arabia

Introduction

In mid-December 2019 a Novel Coronavirus Infected Pneumonia (NCIP) has emerged in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China 1. The World Health Organization (WHO) announced on January 30th, 2020, the appearance of the new coronavirus (nCOV-19) and declared Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) 2. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) has taken the first response on the beginning of February 2020 to the declared PHEIC ordering the evacuation of its citizens from Wuhan, Beijing, and then Hong Kong, Then WHO officially named the novel coronavirus as Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) on the 11th of February 2020 2. The First case of COVID-19 was confirmed in KSA on the 2nd of March 2020 3 and a few days later, WHO characterized COVID-19 as a pandemic 2. In response to this, KSA suspended all international flights.

While preparing this paper, certainly at the beginning of June 2020, numbers of confirmed COVID-19 cases exceeded 6 million with more than 372 thousand deaths worldwide, including more than 87 thousand confirmed cases with 525 deaths in KSA. Locally in Taif, Saudi Arabia, there were a total of 1,574 cases with two deaths so far 3.

Facing this critical situation, the world population is put under exceptional stress; the lockdown, social distancing, financial insecurities, etc. Healthcare workers are not an exception but are rather overwhelmed by the current health challenges especially those who are on the front line facing COVID-19 Pandemic. Previous studies have reported on negative psychological impact on medical staff due to 2003 SARS outbreak 4,6. Maunder R, Hunter J et al found that medical practitioners were afraid of transmitting infection to their family, friends, and colleagues, felt uncertain and stigmatized, and reported reluctance to work, or consider resignation 4. Bai Y, Lin CC et al reported that healthcare workers experienced high levels of stress, anxiety 5. Antoinette M Lee et al. added that healthcare workers also had depression symptoms, which could have long-term psychological implications 6.

Similar concerns about the mental health and adverse psychological reaction among medical staff taking care for patients with COVID-19 are now arising, since recent studies in China have shown that Health practitioners bear a significant psychological burden 7, Wen-Rui Zhang and Kun Wang et al found that healthcare workers had a higher prevalence of insomnia, anxiety, somatization, obsessive-compulsive symptoms and depression, 8 especially those having an underlying organic illness, living in rural areas 8, females, and frontline healthcare workers directly in contact with COVID-19 patients 8,9.

To deal with the secondary mental health problems involved in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need to understand the magnitude of the pandemic effect on mental health, define the most vulnerable groups and analyze the arising symptoms among healthcare workers, on local and international levels. This study aimed to provide an assessment of the mental health problems among Taif health practitioners, in terms of symptoms of depression, anxiety, and insomnia, with analyzing potential risk factors associated with these symptoms, which can serve as important evidence to direct the promotion of mental wellbeing among this special group.

Materials and Methods:

This is a quantitative cross-sectional study conducted among healthcare professionals in Taif, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Data were collected during the period from 29th of April to 20th of May 2020 through the use of anonymous self-reported questionnaires including the socio-demographic and work-related factors, and the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) which has total scores ranging from 0-27 10. A score of 10 has been recommended by several studies as the cut-off score for diagnosing major depressive disorder 11, 12, 13. The second scale was the 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) scale which ranges from 0-21 as a total score 14 with a cut-off score of 10 for diagnosis 15, 16. The last scale was the 7-item Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) which has a maximum score of 28 17 and a cut-off score of 15 for significant insomnia 18, 19.

The following equation was used to determine the sample size: N= (Z2PQ)/D2, While N is sampling size, Z is standard normal deviation at 95% confidence level (Z= 1.96), P is the proportion in target population from a previous study which was 50% 7, Q= 1–p, and D is degree accuracy which was set at 0.05. The sample size according to this equation was 384 but it was decided to increase the sample size by 100% to minimize the effect of any possible sampling error.

Stratified sampling was applied by defining the target population; health practitioners in Taif, Saudi Arabia, deciding the stratification variables which was the occupation; doctors, nurses, and others, then a proportional sampling intended to decide the size of each subgroup. But due to special regulations and precautions during COVID-19 pandemic, an online questionnaire was sent to official workgroups of health practitioners and some sort of self-selection affected sampling.

Data collected were analyzed using Statistical Package for social studies (IBM SPSS) version-24. Distribution and prevalence were presented in numbers and percentages. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare means of different scales’ results. Chi-square test and odds ratios with confidence intervals were used to examine the association between the presence of depression, anxiety, and insomnia and different socio-demographic and work factors. A P-value < 0.05 was chosen as the level of significance.

Ethical approval was obtained from the ethical committee of the Administration of Research and Studies, Ministry of Health in Taif. Informed consent was obtained from all participants. Confidentiality, anonymity, and voluntary participation was assured.

Results:

After excluding responses from outside Taif, the total number of health practitioners who completed the questionnaire was 804. Two-thirds of participants (67.4%) were males (n=541) and 64.3% were Saudi as shown in table 1. The mean age of participants was 36.7 years (SD= ±8.27) and they were from different health fields but the majority were nurses (48.1%) followed by doctors (21.9%). Six hundred (74.7%) were married, and 539 (67.1%) were having children. Participants' work experience was ranging from less than one year to 41 years, with a mean of 11.1 years (SD= ±7.98). Other respondents' characteristics are presented in table 1.

Among all participants, 250 (31.1%) scored 10 or more in PHQ-9 which considered the cut-off score for diagnosing depression ranging from moderate to severe (Table 2). Those who scored 10 or more in GAD-7 were 153 participants (19.1%). Regarding insomnia, 125 participants (15.6%) were found to have moderate or severe insomnia according to ISI (Table 2). All participants who showed symptoms of depression, anxiety, and insomnia, including mild symptoms, were 467 (58%), 355 (44.1%), and 352 (43.7%) respectively.

PHQ-9 scores were found to be higher among female health practitioners; with mean scores of 8.28 (SD= ±5.98), compared with mean scores of males which was 6.85 (SD= ±6.30) a result which was statistically significant (P-value= 0.002). PHQ-9 scores were also significantly higher among Saudi participants, younger ages, single and widowed, those who don’t have children, those who had only bachelor degree as a level of education (Table 3), having direct contact with COVID-19 cases, and having fewer years of experience. Among doctors, residents had higher PHQ-9 scores compared with registrars and consultants.

Regarding anxiety, it was higher according to GAD-7 scores mean in female practitioners, Saudi, younger ages, those who don’t have children, those who had diploma or bachelor degree, those who had chronic diseases, having a previous diagnosis of a psychiatric disorder, having direct contact with COVID-19 cases, pharmacists, having fewer years of experience, and residents compared with other doctors (Table 3).

Regarding insomnia, mean scores of ISI were higher among female gender, Saudi nationality, younger ages, being singles, having no children, having only bachelor degree, those who work in the COVID-19 first-line, those who had direct contact with COVID-19 cases, pharmacists compared with other health practitioners, those with fewer years of experience, and among resident compared with other doctors (Table 3).

According to table 4, risk factors of developing significant depression (PHQ-9 ≥10) included female gender, being Saudi, age <30, and direct contact. Having children appeared to act as protective factor as well as age ≥40. Risk factors of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD-7 ≥10) included being Saudi, age <30 and direct contact, while protective factors included having children, age ≥40 and being a doctor in comparison to other health fields. Regarding insomnia (ISI ≥15), risk factors were female gender, being Saudi, age <30, being in the first-line, and having direct contact. Protective factor of insomnia included age ≥40, having children, and being a doctor.

Discussion:

Previous studies during Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), the Middle East respiratory syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV), and recently during COVID-19 pandemic, have found considerable psychological effects on healthcare workers 20, 21, 22. This current study included 804 health practitioners from Taif governorate during COVID-19 pandemic and showed a high prevalence of mental health symptoms; where 58%, 44.1%, and 43.7% of all participants reported symptoms of depression, anxiety, and insomnia, respectively. This is comparable to the findings of a recent study on COVID-19 in china where 50.4%, 44.6%, and 34.0% of health practitioners reported symptoms of depression, anxiety, and insomnia, respectively 7. Some studies reported less prevalence of mental health symptoms during COVID-19 such as a study of Zhou Zhu et al. in Wuhan during COVID-19 which found that 29.8%, 13.5%, and 24.1% of health worker reported stress, depression, and anxiety symptoms 23. This relatively lower prevalence was also found in Singapore, where proportions were 14.5% for anxiety, 8.9% for depression, 6.6% for stress, and 7.7% for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder 24. On the other hand, other studies reported more prevalence such as a study done on health practitioners during Taiwan's SARS outbreak in 2003 and showed that 77.4% of health practitioners reported anxiety and worrying, and 74.2% reported depression 25. As well, a study done in Hong Kong during SARS outbreak in 2003, found that 68% of healthcare workers have severe levels of job-related stress, and 57% have experienced psychological distress 26. These remarkable variations between different studies may be attributed to several factors such as different scales used and different study areas where many factors may contribute to mental health problems, not only the exposure to the outbreak-related stressors. Another important notion is that even mild symptoms were included in some studies, while other studies considered only those with moderate to severe symptoms. Under the later condition, our current study proportions will be 31.1%, 19.1%, and 15.6% for the prevalence of depression, GAD, and insomnia, respectively.

Our study showed that females have higher scores of depression, anxiety, and insomnia according to the scales used, and female gender was a risk factor for developing significant levels of these disorders, e.g. OR= 1.58 for depression (table 4). This finding is similar to studies results from China and Italy during COVID-19 pandemic 27, 7, and it is expected since gender difference in depression and anxiety is already established 28, 29.

The second factor which showed significant association with more symptoms in all scales was younger age, and the risk of having depression, generalized anxiety disorder, and insomnia is doubled in the age group <30 years. Again this is similar to previous studies results done in China and Italy during COVID-19 pandemic 27, 7. Liang et al. in 2020 found that the younger age of healthcare workers (<30) was associated with higher self-rated depression scores, although this was not a statistically significant difference 30. Some studies found age-group-related differences in the subject matter of worry; worries of health practitioners of younger ages were mainly about infecting their families, while in older ages they were more directed towards the patient’s death 31, 22.

The effect of age may be related to the other result in this current study which was the years of experience since more symptoms of depression, anxiety, and insomnia were associated with little work experience among the surveyed healthcare workers. This result is supported by the previously mentioned studies in China and Italy 27, 7. Being junior was an independent risk factor for anxiety and depression among healthcare workers according to Xiao et al. in 2020 32. Fewer years of experience may be associated with the junior position and so more obligations, more workload, and sometimes more contact with patients; factors that may increase stress.

Having direct contact with COVID-19 patients, per se, was associated with higher scores in all scales of interest in the current study and was an independent risk factor for developing significant depression, GAD, and insomnia. In agreement with this finding, the study of Xiao et al. in 2020 stated that contacting COVID-19 patients directly for all kinds of healthcare workers was independent risk factors for anxiety and depression 32. The same results were proved by several studies 27, 7. This was significant for actual contact with COVID-19 patients and not just being in the first-line since the difference in the latter case was significant only in insomnia in our study. This may be because those health workers in the first-line see different diagnoses and they may, or may not, contact suspected or confirmed cases of COVID-19.

Among socio-demographic factors, single health practitioners showed significantly higher scores in depression and insomnia scales compared with married ones, but the difference was not statistically significant when 'being single' was examined as a risk factor for moderate to severe depression, GAD, and insomnia. Having children was a protective factor from depression, GAD, and insomnia. This may be consistent with a study from Singapore that found that single doctors were at higher risk of developing psychological symptoms 23, as well as other studies with similar results in the general population 33. Having children is a protective factor from burnout 34, and even suicide 35.

The current study showed that being Saudi was a risk factor of developing depression, GAD, and insomnia, which seems to be unexpected since there are many studies that proved that foreigners have more psychological stressors, less support, and more symptoms of depression, adjustment disorders, or even suicidal ideation in comparison with native workers 36, 37, 38. Although Saudi participants were significantly younger than non-Saudi ones, having significantly fewer years of experience, but these were not acting as confounders, since the result was significant after using logistic regression to adjust confounding factors including sex, age, years of experience, health field, working position (first-line or second-line), and having direct contact. So being Saudi was an independent risk factor for depression, GAD, and insomnia in this study population. One factor that can be suggested as an interpretation to this finding, it is that Saudi health workers may have an added stressor which is being afraid of transmitting infection to their extended families especially the elderly, and this is not applied to foreign health workers. The significance of this factor; being worried about harming family, was pointed out in a previous study among healthcare workers 31, 22. However, our study finding needs more investigation to understand its reasons.

This study has a main limitation which is its sampling technique when online questionnaires sent to official workgroups of health practitioners, which allowed some sort of self-selection. Another limitation is that it gives information only about the situation at the time of data collection which may not reflect the whole picture as the COVID-19 pandemic is still expanding.

Conclusion:

Health practitioners in Taif, Saudi Arabia, reported high rates of symptoms of depression, anxiety, and insomnia during the COVID-19 outbreak. The main risk factors for these problems were female gender, being Saudi, younger age and direct contact with COVID-19 patients.

Recommendations:

Researchers recommend immediate intervention to protect at-risk health practitioners, to support and treat those who are already suffering from mental health problems, and to promote mental health research among this special group.

Competing Interests:

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Authors' Contributions:

AI: designed the study, wrote methodology, carried out statistical analysis, interpreted results, and wrote most of discussion and revised the whole manuscript.

IA: designed the questionnaire, participated in data collection, and wrote a part of discussion.

HH: wrote introduction and literature review.

AA: helped in data collection and communication with authorities.

All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgment:

None.

References:

1. Li Q, Guan X, Wu P, Wang X, Zhou L, Tong Y, et al. Early Transmission Dynamics in Wuhan, China, of Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(13):1199-1207. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2001316

2. World Health Organization (WHO) [Internet] https://www.who.int/news-room/detail/27-04-2020-who-timeline---covid-19

3. Saudi Centre for Disease Prevention & Control [Internet] https://covid19.cdc.gov.sa/

4. Maunder R, Hunter J, Vincent L, Bennett J, Peladeau N, Leszcz M, et al. The immediate psychological and occupational impact of the 2003 SARS outbreak in a teaching hospital. CMAJ. 2003;168(10):1245-1251.

5. Bai Y, Lin CC, Lin CY, Chen JY, Chue CM, Chou P. Survey of stress reactions among health care workers involved with the SARS outbreak. Psychiatr Serv. 2004;55(9):1055-1057. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.55.9.1055

6. Lee AM, Wong JG, McAlonan GM, Cheung V, Cheung C, Sham PC, et al. Stress and psychological distress among SARS survivors 1 year after the outbreak. Can J Psychiatry. 2007;52(4):233-240. doi:10.1177/070674370705200405

7. Lai J, Ma S, Wang Y, Cai Z, Hu J, Wei N, et al. Factors Associated With Mental Health Outcomes Among Health Care Workers Exposed to Coronavirus Disease 2019. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(3):e203976. Published 2020 Mar 2. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3976

8. Zhang WR, Wang K, Yin L, Zhao WF, Xue Q, Peng M, et al. Mental Health and Psychosocial Problems of Medical Health Workers during the COVID-19 Epidemic in China [published online ahead of print, 2020 Apr 9]. Psychother Psychosom. 2020;1-9. doi:10.1159/000507639

9. Rana W, Mukhtar S, Mukhtar S. Mental health of medical workers in Pakistan during the pandemic COVID-19 outbreak [published online ahead of print, 2020 Apr 7]. Asian J Psychiatr. 2020;51:102080. doi:10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102080

10. Zhang YL, Liang W, Chen ZM, Zhang HM, Zhang JH, Weng XQ, et al. Validity and reliability of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and Patient Health Questionnaire-2 to screen for depression among college students in China. Asia Pac Psychiatry. 2013;5(4):268-275. doi:10.1111/appy.12103

11. Kroenke K, Spitzer R, Williams J. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med 2001;16:606-13.

12. Azah N. Shah M, Juwita S, Bahri I, Rushidi W, Jamil Y. Validation of the Malay version brief Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) among adult attending family medicine clinics. Int Med J 2005;12:259-64.

13. Stafford L, Berk M, Jackson H. Validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 to screen for depression in patients with coronary artery disease. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2007;29:417-24.

14. He XY, Li CB, Qian J, Cui HS, Wu WY. Reliability and validity of a generalized anxiety scale in general hospital outpatients. Shanghai Arch Psychiatry. 22(4):200-203. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1002-0829.2010.04.002

15. Johnson SU, Ulvenes PG, Øktedalen T, Hoffart A. Psychometric Properties of the General Anxiety Disorder 7-Item (GAD-7) Scale in a Heterogeneous Psychiatric Sample. Front Psychol. 2019;10:1713. Published 2019 Aug 6. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01713

16. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Löwe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(10):1092-1097. doi:10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092

17. Yu DS. Insomnia Severity Index: psychometric properties with Chinese community-dwelling older people. J Adv Nurs. 2010;66(10):2350-2359. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05394.x

18. Morin CM, Colecchi C, Stone J, Sood RM, Brink D. Behavioral and pharmacological therapies for late-life insomnia: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Assoc 1999;281:991-999.

19. Bastien CH, Vallières A, Morin CM. Validation of the Insomnia Severity Index as an outcome measure for insomnia research. Sleep Med. 2001;2(4):297-307. doi:10.1016/s1389-9457(00)00065-4

20. Nickell LA, Crighton EJ, Tracy CS, Al-Enazy H, Bolaji Y, Hanjrah S, et al. Psychosocial effects of SARS on hospital staff: survey of a large tertiary care institution. CMAJ. 2004;170(5):793‐798. doi:10.1503/cmaj.1031077

21. Khalid I, Khalid TJ, Qabajah MR, Barnard AG, Qushmaq IA. Healthcare Workers Emotions, Perceived Stressors and Coping Strategies During a MERS-CoV Outbreak. Clin Med Res. 2016;14(1):7‐14. doi:10.3121/cmr.2016.1303

22. Spoorthy MS, Pratapa SK, Mahant S. Mental health problems faced by healthcare workers due to the COVID-19 pandemic-A review [published online ahead of print, 2020 Apr 22]. Asian J Psychiatr. 2020;51:102119. doi:10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102119

23. Zhu Z, Xu S, Wang H, Liu Z, Wu J, Li G, et al. COVID-19 in Wuhan: Immediate Psychological Impact on 5062 Health Workers. doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.20.20025338

Accessed on: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.02.20.20025338v2

24. Chan AO, Huak CY. Psychological impact of the 2003 severe acute respiratory syndrome outbreak on health care workers in a medium size regional general hospital in Singapore. Occup Med (Lond). 2004;54(3):190-196. doi:10.1093/occmed/kqh027

25. Chen R, Chou KR, Huang YJ, Wang TS, Liu SY, Ho LY. Effects of a SARS prevention programme in Taiwan on nursing staff's anxiety, depression and sleep quality: a longitudinal survey. Int J Nurs Stud. 2006;43(2):215-225. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.03.006

26. Tam CW, Pang EP, Lam LC, Chiu HF. Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in Hong Kong in 2003: stress and psychological impact among frontline healthcare workers. Psychological medicine 2004;34:1197-204

27. Rossi R, Socci V, Pacitti F, Di Lorenzo G, Di Marco A, Siracusano A, et al. Mental Health Outcomes Among Frontline and Second-Line Health Care Workers During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic in Italy. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(5):e2010185. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.10185

28. Albert PR. Why is depression more prevalent in women? J. Psychiatry Neurosci. 2015; 40: 219–21.

29. Pappa S, Ntella V, Giannakas T, Giannakoulis V, Papoutsi E, Katsaounou P. Prevalence of depression, anxiety, and insomnia among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis, Brain, Behavior, and Immunity (2020), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi. 2020.05.026

30. Liang Y, Chen M, Zheng X, Liu J. Screening for Chinese medical staff mental health by SDS and SAS during the outbreak of COVID-19 [published online ahead of print, 2020 Mar 21]. J Psychosom Res. 2020;133:110102. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.110102

31. Cai H, Tu B, Ma J, Chen L, Fu L, Jiang Y, et al. Psychological impact and coping strategies of frontline medical staff in Hunan between January and March 2020 during the outbreak of corona virus disease 2019 (COVID19) in Hubei, China. Med. Sci. Monit. 2020 Apr 15;26:e924171.

32. Xiao X, Zhu X, Fu S, Hu Y, Li X, Xiao J. Psychological impact of healthcare workers in China during COVID-19 pneumonia epidemic: A multi-center cross-sectional survey investigation. J Affect Disord. 2020;274:405‐410. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2020.05.081

33. Bas-Sarmiento P, Saucedo-Moreno MJ, Fernández-Gutiérrez M, Poza-Méndez M. Mental Health in Immigrants Versus Native Population: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2017;31(1):111‐121. doi:10.1016/j.apnu.2016.07.014

34. Garbarino S, Cuomo G, Chiorri C, Magnavita N. Association of work-related stress with mental health problems in a special police force unit. BMJ Open. 2013;3(7):e002791. Published 2013 Jul 19. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002791

35. Driver K, Abed RT. Does having offspring reduce the risk of suicide in women?. Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2004;8(1):25‐29. doi:10.1080/13651500310004506

36. Font A, Moncada S, Benavides FG. The relationship between immigration and mental health: what is the role of workplace psychosocial factors. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2012;85(7):801‐806. doi:10.1007/s00420-011-0724-6

37. Al-Maskari F, Shah SM, Al-Sharhan R, Al-Haj E, Al-Kaabi K, Khonji D, et al. Prevalence of depression and suicidal behaviors among male migrant workers in United Arab Emirates. J Immigr Minor Health. 2011;13(6):1027‐1032. doi:10.1007/s10903-011-9470-9

38. Doki S, Sasahara S, Matsuzaki I. Stress of working abroad: a systematic review. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2018;91(7):767‐784. doi:10.1007/s00420-018-1333-4

IMP-10.5455/mjhs.2021.04.004 Majmaah Journal of Health Sciences