Patients' Disclosure Preferences when Hypothetically Diagnosed with a Terminal Illness

Abstract

Background and Aims: Breaking bad news to patients is a challenge for physicians, nurses, and other healthcare professionals in various clinical settings. This study aims to explore patients' preferences when being told about an emerging life-threatening terminal illness, such as cancer, and to determine specific factors that can affect individuals' responses upon the disclosure of the disease and its prognosis. Methods: We employed a quantitative-cross sectional design using a convenient sample. A total number of 814 participants responded to an online survey invitation from four major cities in Saudi Arabia. Descriptive analysis was used to represent the socio-demographic characteristics of the participants, and the Chi-square (χ2) test was performed to analyze the differences in the disclosure preferences. Results: Most participants preferred to be directly informed about an emerging diagnosis (85.7%), wished to be with their family upon the disclosure of the disease (98.3%), and preferred to be actively involved in the decision-making and treatment plan. Female participants noted to be keener for a diagnosis disclosure than males χ2(2) ≤ 18.7, p < .01, and the same observation seen in singles compared to married participants, χ2(4) ≤ 10.91, p < .05. Conclusions: This study investigated public responses and preferences when being told about a terminal medical diagnosis. Healthcare providers are advised to plan ahead and make a strategy to report bad news to lessen the psychological burden on patients and their families.

References

1. 1.Fujimori M, Uchitomi Y. Preferences of CancerPatientsRegardingCommunication of Bad News: A Systematic Literature Review. JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINI- CAL ONCOLOGY 2009;39(4):201–16. 4.Tang W-R, Hong J-H, Rau K-M, Wang C-H, Juang Y-Y, Lai C-H, Fujimori, M & Fang, C-K. truth telling in Taiwanese cancercare:patients’andfamilies’preferences and their experiences of doctors’practices. Psycho-oncology. 2017;26(7):999–1005. 5.Welborn T. Giving Bad News. The Permanente journal. 2021;23.
2. 2.Liu Y, Yang J, Song L, Yang X, Yin Y, Yan L. Nurses’ experiences and attitudes toward diagnosis disclosure for cancer patients in China: A qualitative study. Psycho-oncology. 2019 28(12):2415–21. 7.AlsharariAF. The needs of family members of patients admitted to the intensive care unit. Patient Preference &Adherence. 2019;13:465–73. 8.Ali-Akbar Nejatisafa, Mohammad Reza Mohammadi, Mohsen Arjmand, Samira Shirzad, Mohammad Taher, Ava Roozdar, Mohammad Arbabi, Mamak Tah- Majmaah Journal of Health Sciences ,Vol. 9, Issue 4, October - 2021, Safar - 1443 69 Patients’Disclosure Preferences when Hypothetically Diagnosed with a Terminal Illness masebi, and Alale Roozdar. How to Break Bad News: Physicians’ and Nurses’ Attitudes. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry 2010;5(4):128–33.
3. 3.Elger B. S., Harding T. W. Should Cancer Patients Be Informed about Their Diagnosis and Prognosis? Future Doctors and Lawyers Differ. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2002; 28(4):258–65.
4. 4.Ozdogan M, Samur M, Artac M, Yildiz M, Savas B, Bozcuk HS. Factors related to truth-telling practice of physicians treating patients with cancer in Turkey. Journal of palliative medicine. 2006;9(5):1114-9.
5. 5.What Are Terminally Ill Cancer Patients Told About Their Expected Deaths? A Study of Cancer Physicians’ Self-Reports of Prognosis Disclosure. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2008;26(36):5988–93.
6. 6.Abbas S, Muhammad S, Mubeen S, Abbas S. Awareness of palliative medicine among Pakistani doctors: a survey. Journal-Pakistan Medical Association. 2004;54(4):195-8.
7. 7.Öksüzoǧlu B, Abali H, Bakar M, Yildirim N, Zengin N. Disclosure of cancer diagnosis to patients and their relatives in Turkey: Views of accompanying persons and influential factors in reaching those views. Tumori. 2021;92(1):62–6.
8. 8.Zekri J, Karim SM. Breaking Cancer Bad News to Patients With Cancer: A Comprehensive Perspective of Patients, Their Relatives, and the Public-Example From a Middle Eastern Country. Journal of global oncology. 2016;2(5):268–74.
9. 9.Huijer HA-S, Abboud S, Dimassi H. Palliative care in Lebanon: Knowledge, attitudes and practices of nurses. International Journal of Palliative Nursing. 2009;15(7):346–53.
10. 10.VleminckAD, Pardon K, Roelands M, Houttekier D, Block LV den, Stichele RV, & Deliens, L. Information preferences of the general population when faced with life-limiting illness. European Journal of Public Health. 2015;25(3):532–8.
11. 11.Alzahrani AS, Alqahtani A, Alhazmi M, Gaafar R, Bajabir D, Alharbi IM, Alharbi AM, Kheshaifaty G & Alzahrani A. Attitudes of cancer patients and their families toward disclosure of cancer diagnosis in Saudi Arabia: a Middle Eastern population example. Patient Preference &Adherence. 2018;12:1659–66..
12. 12.Hahne J, LiangT, Khoshnood K,Wang X, Li X. Breaking bad news about cancer in China: Concerns and conflicts faced by doctors deciding whether to inform patients. Patient Education and Counseling. 2020;103(2):286–91.
13. 13.Shin DW, Cho J, Kim SY, Chung IJ, Kim SS, Yang HK, Ahn E, Park BR, Seo 70 Majmaah Journal of Health Sciences ,Vol. 9, Issue 4, October - 2021, Safar - 1443 Patients’Disclosure Preferences when Hypothetically Diagnosed with a Terminal Illness H & Park J-H. Discordance among patient preferences, caregiver preferences, and caregiver predictions of patient preferences regarding disclosure of terminal status and end-of-life choices. Psycho-oncology;24(2):212–9..
14. 14.Carmel S, Singer Y, Yosef-Sela N, Bachner YG. Open communication between caregivers’and terminally ill cancer patients about illness and death: The role of gender -Acorrelational study. European Journal of Oncology Nursing . 2020;49.
15. 15.Rao A, Sunil B, Ekstrand M, Shet A, Raju G, Heylen E. Breaking bad news: Patient preferences and the role of family members when delivering a cancer diagnosis.Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention.;17(4):1779–84..
16. 16.Al-Amri AM. Disclosure of cancer information among Saudi cancer patients. Indian journal of cancer.;53(4):615–8.