Abstract
In 1920, Otto Warburg established the Warburg Effect which is defined as the unusual fuel generation by the cancer cells through their dependence on glucose metabolism. The aim of the current review is to present the evidence for the association between cancer development and carbohydrate intake and the ketogenic diet usefulness for these patients. Search was conducted in PubMed, Scopes, and Wiley Online Library during 5th November 2021 to 1st December 2021 with searching terms of sugar and cancer, carbohydrates intake and cancer, the ketogenic diet and cancer. RefWorks was used for managing the references. One hundred and seventy studies were found based on inclusion criteria. There are limited metabolic ward randomized clinical trials (RCT) that investigated cancer development with carbohydrates intake, free sugar, or the ketogenic diet. Most studies used food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) as a dietary assessment tool for intake collection however, this method is not intended for this purpose. Results were inconsistent some studies reported carbohydrate intake with adverse effect on endometrial cancer, pancreatic cancer, or overall cancer. On the other hand, some studies reported no effect or a possible protective effect for fibers and low glycemic index carbohydrates. Overall, the relationship is debatable. However, carbohydrate is an important macronutrient for optimum health. In conclusion, there is not enough high-quality evidence to support the hypothesis of carbohydrates and free sugar association with cancer progression additionally the ketogenic diets studies had some limitations. This paper suggests the need for interventional metabolic ward studies with appropriate dietary assessment methods.
Keywords: Ketogenic diet (KD) · Glycemic index (GI) · Glycemic Load (GL) · Sugars · Warburg Effect · Alkaline phosphatase (ALP)
References
- 1.Kaur R. 2015 How Old is Cancer? [Internet] Available at http://nopr.niscair. res.in/bitstream/123456789/31929/1/ SR%2052(8)%2023-24.pdf [Accessed on 28th December 2021]
- 2.Shackelford TK, Weekes-Shackelford VA, editors. Encyclopedia of evolutionary psychological science. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2016.
- 3.Siegel, R.L., Miller, K.D., Fuchs, H.E. and Jemal, A., 2021. Cancer statistics, 2021. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians, 71(1), pp.7-33.
- 4.Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2021 May;71(3):209-49.
- 5.QuintWG,PagliusiSR,LelieN,deVilliers EM, Wheeler CM. World Health Organization Human Papillomavirus DNA INternaitonal Collaborative Stduy Group: Results of the first World 110 Majmaah Journal of Health Sciences ,Vol. 10, Issue 4, October - 2022, Rabi’AL-Awwal - 1444 The Effect of Carbohydrates Intake, Free Sugars, and Ketogenic Diet on Cancer Development; Critical Review of the literature. Health Organization international collaborative study of detection of human papillomavirus DNA. J Clin Microbiol. 2006 Feb;44(2):571-9.
- 6.Falcaro M, Castañon A, Ndlela B, Checchi M, Soldan K, Lopez-Bernal J, Elliss-Brookes L, Sasieni P.The effects of the national HPV vaccination programme in England, UK, on cervical cancer and grade 3 cervical intraepithelialneoplasiaincidence:aregister-based observational study. The Lancet. 2021 Dec 4;398(10316):2084-92.
- 7.Hussain AN, Alkhenizan A, McWalter P, Qazi N, Alshmassi A, Farooqi S, Abdulkarim A. Attitudes and perceptions towards HPV vaccination among young women in SaudiArabia. Journal of Family & Community Medicine. 2016 Sep;23(3):145.
- 8.Vogt PK. Cancer genes. Western journal of medicine. 1993 Mar;158(3):273.
- 9.Weinberg RA.Tumor suppressorgenes. Science.1991Nov22;254(5035):1138-
- 10.66.Huang J, Pan G, Jiang H, LiW, Dong J, Zhang H, Ji X, Zhu Z. A meta-analysis between dietary carbohydrate intake and colorectal cancer risk: evidence from 17 observational studies. Bioscience reports. 2017 Apr 30;37(2). 67.Jiao L, Flood A, Subar AF, Hollenbeck AR, Schatzkin A, Stolzenberg-SolomonR.Glycemicindex,carbohydrates, glycemic load, and the risk of pancreatic cancer in a prospective cohort study. Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Biomarkers. 2009 Apr 1;18(4):1144-
- 11.Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition (SACN) Report for the lower carbohydrates diets for type 2 diabetes [Internet]. GOV.UK. 2022 [cited 10 October 2021]. Available from https:// www.gov.uk/government/publications/ sacn-report-lower-carbohydrate-diets-for-type-2-diabetes
- 12.Slavin J. Fiber and prebiotics: mechanisms and health benefits. Nutrients. 2013 Apr;5(4):1417-35.
- 13.Tsubono Y, Takahashi T, Iwase Y, Iitoi Y, Akabane M, Tsugane S. Nutrient consumption and gastric cancer mortality in five regions of Japan. 1997;310-315.
- 14.Tasevska N. Urinary sugars—a biomarker of total sugars intake. Nutrients. 2015 Jul;7(7):5816-33.
- 15.Vallianou NG, Evangelopoulos A, Skourtis A, Kazazis C. honey and cancer--a review. Current Topics in Nutraceutical Research. 2014 Aug 1;12(3).
- 16.Vidal AC, Williams CD, Allott EH, Howard LE, Grant DJ, McPhail M, Sourbeer KN, Hwa LP, Boffetta P, Hoyo C, Freedland SJ. Carbohydrate intake, glycemic index and prostate cancer risk. The Prostate. 2015 Mar;75(4):430-9.
- 17.Von Haehling S, Anker SD. Prevalence, incidence and clinical impact of cachexia: facts and numbers—update 2014. Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle. 2014 Dec;5(4):261-3.
- 18.Wang T, Siopis G, Wong HY, Allman-Farinelli M. Poor quality of dietary assessment in randomized controlledtrialsofnutritionalinterventions for type 2 diabetes may affect outcome conclusions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutrition. 2022 Feb 1;94:111498.
- 19.WILDERRM.Theeffectsofketonemia on the course of epilepsy. InMayo Clin Proc 1921 (Vol. 2, pp. 307-308).
- 20.Woolf E, Scheck A. The ketogenic diet for the treatment of malignant glioma. Journal of Lipid Research. 2015;56(1):5-10.
- 21.WoolfEC,SyedN,ScheckAC.Tumor metabolism, the ketogenic diet and β-hydroxybutyrate: novel approaches to adjuvant brain tumor therapy. Fron- 120 Majmaah Journal of Health Sciences ,Vol. 10, Issue 4, October - 2022, Rabi’AL-Awwal - 1444 The Effect of Carbohydrates Intake, Free Sugars, and Ketogenic Diet on Cancer Development; Critical Review of the literature. tiers in molecular neuroscience. 2016 Nov 16;9:122.
- 22.Xuan F, Li W, Guo X, Liu C. Dietary carbohydrate intake and the risk of esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis. Bioscience Reports. 2020;40(2).
- 23.Ye Y, Wu Y, Xu J, Ding K, Shan X, Xia D. Association between dietary carbohydrate intake, glycemic index and glycemic load, and risk of gastric cancer. European journal of nutrition. 2017 Apr;56(3):1169-77.
- 24.Yeung CH, Louie JC. Methodology for the assessment of added/free sugar intake in epidemiological studies. Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition & Metabolic Care. 2019 Jul 1;22(4):271-
- 25.Zhai L, Cheng S, Zhang D. Dietary carbohydrate and prostate cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Nutrition and cancer. 2015 May 19;67(4):594-602.
- 26.Zheng B, Shen H, Han H, Han T, QinY. Dietary fiber intake and reduced risk of ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis. Nutrition journal. 2018 Dec;17(1):1-0.
- 27.Zhu J, Tu H, Matin SF, Tannir NM, Wood CG, Wu X. Glycemic index, glycemic load and carbohydrate intake in association with risk of renal cell carcinoma. Carcinogenesis. 2017 Oct 26;38(11):1129-35.
- 28.Lane J, Brown NI,Williams S, Plaisance EP, Fontaine KR. Ketogenic Diet for Cancer: Critical Assessment and Research Recommendations. Nutrients. 2021 Oct;13(10):3562.
- 29.RoseDJ,DeMeoMT,Keshavarzian A, Hamaker BR. Influence of dietary fiber on inflammatory bowel disease and colon cancer: importance of fermentation pattern. Nutrition reviews. 2007 Feb 1;65(2):51-62.
- 30.SchlesingerS,ChanDS,Vingeliene S, Vieira AR, Abar L, Polemiti E, StevensCA,GreenwoodDC,AuneD,Norat T. Carbohydrates, glycemic index, glycemic load, and breast cancer risk: a systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis of prospective studies. Nutrition reviews. 2017 Jun 1.
Peer review
Peer reviewed by 3 reviewers, who chose to remain anonymous.