Abstract

Background and Aims: Defensive medicine is medicine practiced in such a way primarily to avoid or defend against the threat of malpractice litigation. The rate of practice of defensive medicine has been increasing in recent years across the world. High percentages of defensive medicine have a significant economic cost through affecting doctors’ decisions. The problem is compounded in Egypt as it currently lacks a medical litigation law, and doctors in Egypt are tried by the criminal law instead. This study aims to identify the practice of defensive medicine in light of such conditions, as well as highlight some of its causes. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study conducted by a self-administered questionnaire among obstetricians and gynecologists of Kasr Alainy University OBGYN Hospital. It included 160 doctors from a total of 250 doctors. Binary logistic regression and Chi square tests were used to calculate the predictors of practice of defensive medicine and its forms. Results: (81%) of the doctors practiced at least one form of defensive medicine. Many predictors were significant including duration of practice, gender (male), witnessing a colleague getting sued or personally getting sued, and feeling limited in practice due to the current state of the law. Conclusions: The practice of Defensive medicine in Kasr Alainy OBGYN Hospital is considerably high but still in line with other countries. The lack of medical law is a significant factor, but there are other factors affecting the practice of defensive medicine. Efforts to reduce defensive medicine must start with enacting a medical law.

Keywords: Defensive medicine · Medical liability · Malpractice · Litigation · Defensive practice

References

  1. 1.Baungaard N, Skovvang PL, Hvidt EA, Gerbild H, Andersen MK, Lykkegaard J. How defensive medicine is defined in European medical literature: a systematic review. BMJ Open [Internet]. 2022 Jan;12(1):e057169. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1136%2Fbmjopen-2021-057169
  2. 2.S.Y.Tan. Law & Medicine: Health care costs and defensive medicine. LAW & MEDICINE. 2016 Mar 9;
  3. 3.Bradley CP. Factors which influence the decision whether or not to prescribe: the dilemma facing general practitioners. Br J Gen Pract. 1992 Nov;42(364):454–8.
  4. 4.Katz E. Defensive Medicine: A Case and Review of Its Status and Possible Solutions. Clin Pract Cases Emerg Med [Internet]. 2019 Oct;3(4): 329–32. Available from: https://doi. org/10.5811%2Fcpcem.2019.9.43975
  5. 5.Obligation To Provide Services: A Physician-Public Defender Comparison. AMA J Ethics [Internet]. 2006 May;8(5):332–4. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1001%2Fvirtualmentor.2006.8.5.msoc1-0605
  6. 6.Healey BJ K& S. PHYSICIANS, DE- FENSIVE MEDICINEAND ETHICS. Academy of Health Care Management Journa. 2011 Aug; 14 Majmaah Journal of Health Sciences ,Vol. 11, Issue 1, January - 2023, Jumada al-Akhirah - 1444 Defensive medicine and medical liability: a cross sectional study in KasrAlainy obstetrics and gynecology hospital
  7. 7.Reynolds RA. The Cost of Medical Professional Liability. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association [Internet]. 1987 May;257(20):2776. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1001%2Fjama.1987.03390200116025
  8. 8.SekharMs,VyasN.Defensivemedicine: A bane to healthcare. Ann Med Health Sci Res [Internet]. 2013;3(2):295. Available from: https://doi. org/10.4103%2F2141-9248.113688

Peer review

Peer reviewed by 3 reviewers, who chose to remain anonymous.

Majmaah Journal of Health Sciences · eISSN 1658-8223 · Majmaah University · open access