Modify approach for Radiology utilization rate calculation in emergency Department at Saudi Arabia

Abstract

Background and Aims: Healthcare debates emphasize optimizing costly imaging equipment use (e.g., CT, X-rays) contributing significantly to expenses. This study assessed American and Canadian utilization techniques, integrating a modified equation. Objectives were to aid decision-makers in evaluating current equipment use and refining equations for better efficiency. Methods: Data collection and analysis evaluated current utilization approaches. Comparative analysis using the modified equation highlighted differences between American and Canadian standards, offering insights for improvement. Results: Findings revealed disparities in techniques used in both healthcare systems. The modified equation enabled a detailed comparison, pinpointing areas for enhancement. Decision-makers gained a comprehensive understanding of equipment usage, identifying avenues for efficiency and resource optimization. Conclusions: The study underscores the necessity of reassessing and refining utilization equations for expensive medical equipment. Insights provided a roadmap for decision-makers, enabling them to implement strategies enhancing efficiency and maximizing resource potential. By aiming for more effective utilization, healthcare systems can navigate challenges posed by costly imaging equipment, ultimately advancing healthcare quality and accessibility.

References

1. 1.U.S. Food and Drug Administration. June 14, 2019.
2. 2.Broder J, Fordham LA, Warshauer DM. Increasing utilization of computed tomography in the pediatric emergency department, 2000–2006. Emerg Radiol. 2007; 14(4):227-232.
3. 3.Lee J, Kirschner J, Pawa S, Wiener DE, Newman DH, Shah K. Computed tomography use in the adult emergency department of an academic urban hospital from 2001 to 2007. Ann Emerg Med. 2010; 56(6):591-596.
4. 4.Broder J, Warshauer DM. Increasing utilization of computed tomography in theadultemergencydepartment,2000– 2005.EmergRadiol.2006;13(1):25-30.
5. 5.Pandharipande PV, Reisner AT, Binder WD, Zaheer A, Gunn ML, Linnau KF, Miller CM, et al. CT in the emergency department: a real-time study of changes in physician decision making. Radiology. 2015; 278(3):812-821.
6. 6.Schuitema H, Espinosa J, Lucerna A. Herding CATS: ED CT Utilization Pi- 28 Majmaah Journal of Health Sciences ,Vol. 12, Issue 2 , April - 2024, Shawwal - 1445 Modify approach for Radiology utilization rate calculation in emergency Department at SaudiArabia lotStudy:ProviderFactors.MJE-Med. 2017;2(2):023.
7. 7.Selvarajan SK, Levin DC, Parker L. The Increasing Use of Emergency Department Imaging in the United States: Is It Appropriate?. Am J Roentgenol. 2019:1-5.
8. 8.Chung JH, Duszak Jr RD, Hemingway J, Hughes DR, Rosenkrantz AB. Increasing utilization of chest imaging in US emergency departments from 1994 to 2015. J Am Coll Radiol. 2019;16(5):674-682.