Abstract

Background and Aims: Regular engagement in physical activity (PA) has been known to associate with improved health and quality of life measures. Prior research reported that only 46% of Saudi college students meet the weekly recommended PA volumes. However, these prior studies lack using standardized PA assessment methods, and therefore, this study examined PA levels and calculated the proportions meeting the weekly PA guidelines among college students currently enrolled in Majmaah university, Saudi Arabia. Methods: Currently enrolled college students at Majmaah university were included. PA levels was evaluated using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form. This questionnaire contains 7-item questions regarding the weekly time spent in vigorous-to-moderate PA (MVPA), walking, and sitting behavior. Additionally, proportions meeting the weekly recommended PA was calculated. Results: One hundred and fifty-eight college students were enrolled (41.2% males, M age≤ 23.32 ± 4.5 years, and M body mass index (BMI)≤ 24.1±5.0 kg/m²). Male college students spent more time in MVPA (p≤0.001, d≤0.50) and met the weekly recommended PA cutoffs at a higher proportion compared to female college students (p≤0.023). There were no other significant differences in PA levels between male and female college students (all p values >0.05). Conclusions: Male college students spent more time in higher activity intensity and met the weekly recommended activity cutoffs at a higher proportion than female students at Majmaah University. Future research should examine factors associated with increased activity levels such as socioeconomic status and/or physical or mental status among college students.

Keywords: Activity · Saudi Arabia · Exercise · Students

References

  1. 1.Caspersen CJ, Powell KE, Christenson GM. Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness: definitions and distinctions for health-related research. Public Health Rep. 1985;100(2):126-131.
  2. 2.Surgeon General's report on physical ac­ tivity and health. From the Centers for Dis­ ease Control and Prevention. JAMA. 1996;276(7):522.
  3. 3.Piercy KL, Troiano RP. Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans From the US De­ partment of Health and Human Services. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018;ll(ll):e005263.
  4. 4.Piercy KL, Troiano RP. Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans From the US De­ partment of Health and Human Services. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018;ll(ll):e005263.
  5. 5.Li J, Siegrist J. Physical activity and risk of cardiovascular disease—a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2012;9(2):391-407.
  6. 6.Strohle A. Physical activity, exercise, de­ pression and anxiety disorders. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2009;116(6):777-784.
  7. 7.Naal FD, Impellizzeri FM, Leunig M. Which is the best activity rating scale for pa­ tients undergoing total joint arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(4):958-965.
  8. 8.Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M, et al. International physical activity question­ naire: 12-country reliability and validity. Medicine and science in sports and exercise. 2003;35(8):1381-1395.
  9. 9.Freedson PS, Melanson E, Sirard J. Cali­ bration of the Computer Science and Appli­ cations, Inc. accelerometer. Medicine and science in sports and exercise. 1998;30(5):777-781.
  10. 10.Barwais FA. Physical Activity Levels among Male and Female Undergraduate Students at Umm Al-Qura University. The International Scientific Journal of Physical Education and Sport Sciences. 2021;9(l):39-49.
  11. 11.Awadalla NJ, Aboelyazed AE, Hassanein MA, et al. Assessment of physical inac­ tivity and perceived barriers to physical ac­ tivity among health college students, south-western Saudi Arabia. East Mediterr Health J. 2014;20(10):596-604.
  12. 12.Al-Hazzaa H. Patterns of physical activ­ ity among Saudi children, adolescents and adults with special reference to health. Nu­ trition and Physical Activity in the Arab Do College Students At Majmaah University Meet the Weekly Recommended Physical Activity Guidelines? Cross-Sectional Analyses Majmaah Journal of Health Sciences , Volume 12 Issue 4 October 2024, Rabi Al-Awwal 1446 Countries of the Near East Manama: Bah­ rain Center for Studies and Research. 2000:109-127.
  13. 13.Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. ed. Hillsdale, N.J: L. Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
  14. 14.Al-Hassan YT, Fabella E, Estrella E, Al-Ramadan HA, Bujbara AH. Utilizing the Health Belief Model in Determining the Association between Perceptions on Obesity and Exercise Behav­ ior of Saudi University Students. The open public health journal. 2020;13(l):87-93.
  15. 15.Sharara E, Akik C, Ghattas H, Makhlouf Obermeyer C. Physical inactivity, gender and culture in Arab countries: a sys­ tematic assessment of the literature. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(l):639.
  16. 16.Rosselli M, Ermini E, Tosi B, et al. Gender differences in barriers to physical ac­ tivity among adolescents. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2020;30(9):1582-1589.
  17. 17.Whipple MO, Pinto AJ, Abushamat LA, et al. Sex Differences in Physical Activi­ ty Among Individuals With Type 2 Diabe­ tes Across the Life Span: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Diabetes Care. 2022;45(9):2163-2177.
  18. 18.Lee PH, Macfarlane DJ, Lam TH, Stewart SM. Validity of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form (IPAQjSF): a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8:115. Do college students at Majmaah University Meet the Weekly Recommended Physical Activity Guidelines? Cross-Sectional Analyses

Peer review

Peer reviewed by 2 reviewers, who chose to remain anonymous.

Majmaah Journal of Health Sciences · eISSN 1658-8223 · Majmaah University · open access