Neuro-circadian Disruption and Occupational Health Resilience in Psychiatric Nursing: A Systematic Review of Sleep–Emotion–Stress Interconnections and Evidence-Based Interventions

Introduction

Psychiatric nursing occupies a complex clinical landscape merging high acuity with intense emotional labor. Mental health nurses routinely navigate aggression, suicidality, and psychosis while maintaining a therapeutic alliance.¹ This psychological burden is exacerbated by structural stressors, including rotating shifts, staffing shortages, and the stigma associated with psychiatric care. Consequently, this workforce faces disproportionate risks for sleep disturbance, burnout, and secondary traumatic stress.² Despite these known risks, the "neuro-circadian" interplay between biological rhythm disruption and occupational stress remains under-researched in workforce wellness strategies.^3-5

Operational Definitions: To ensure conceptual clarity, this review operationalizes the following core constructs: Burnout: A syndrome of chronic workplace stress defined by energy depletion, increased mental distance or cynicism regarding one’s job, and reduced professional efficacy.⁶ Secondary Traumatic Stress (STS): Distinct from burnout, STS refers to emotional duress mimicking PTSD symptoms, resulting specifically from sustained empathetic engagement with traumatized patients.⁷ Emotional Dysregulation: The impairment in modulating affective states, often linked to stress-induced alterations in prefrontal-limbic neurobiology.⁸ Resilience: Viewed here as a dynamic capacity for adaptation emerging from the interaction between individual coping mechanisms and organizational support, rather than a static personality trait.⁹

The Neuro-circadian Disruption Framework: The proposed "Neuro-circadian Disruption Framework" (see Figure 2 in Discussion) posits that occupational stress and circadian misalignment are not isolated variables but converging forces on shared neural systems. Specifically, the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis and prefrontal-limbic circuitry are compromised by recurrent night shifts and irregular sleep-wake cycles. This disruption alters melatonin and cortisol rhythms, diminishing executive control over emotional reactivity. Chronic sympathetic activation leads to sleep fragmentation, which further impairs the cognitive reserves necessary for empathy and vigilance—critical components of psychiatric care. Understanding these bidirectional sleep-emotion-stress interconnections is essential for designing interventions that align biological rhythms with professional demands.^10-13

Figure 2: The Neuro-circadian Disruption Framework

In psychiatric nursing, where sustained empathy and vigilance are essential, even subtle neuro-circadian imbalance may erode therapeutic engagement and heighten vulnerability to compassion fatigue. Understanding these physiological pathways supports the design of resilience enhancing interventions that align biological rhythms with professional demands.¹⁴

Traditional wellness initiatives have emphasized individual coping and self-care11. Contemporary perspectives recognize occupational health resilience as a dynamic interaction between personal adaptability and organizational context. 15-17 Resilient psychiatric nursing systems are characterized by supportive leadership, fair scheduling, opportunities for debriefing, and environments that normalize rest and psychological recovery. A multilevel approach integrating individual mindfulness with systemic reforms offers the most sustainable protection against chronic stress and attrition.¹⁸

Objectives: This systematic review aimed to provide a comprehensive synthesis of the current evidence regarding the occupational health challenges faced by psychiatric nursing professionals. Specifically, the review sought to:

1. Synthesize evidence concerning the prevalence and the complex interrelationships between sleep disturbance, emotional dysregulation, and occupational stress.

1. Examine the underlying neurobiological mechanisms, such as HPA-axis activation and prefrontal-limbic imbalances, that link these domains.

1. Evaluate the efficacy of various individual-level and organizational-level interventions in mitigating these risks.

1. Identify critical methodological limitations and evidence gaps within the existing literature.

1. Formulate actionable, evidence-based recommendations for healthcare policy, nursing education, and clinical practice to foster long-term professional resilience.

Methods A systematic review was undertaken following the PRISMA 2020 statement.¹⁹ The review protocol encompassed literature published between 2020 and 2025 to capture post-pandemic trends in mental health nursing.

Databases searched: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar. Boolean strings combined terms for psychiatric nursing, sleep disturbance, emotion regulation, burnout, and occupational stress.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion: peer-reviewed English-language studies (2020–2025) involving psychiatric or mental-health nurses; quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-methods designs; ≥ 20 participants. Exclusion: case reports, abstracts only, predatory journals, or studies unrelated to psychiatric settings.

Quality Appraisal: Quality and bias were assessed using AMSTAR 2, Cochrane RoB 2, Newcastle–Ottawa Scale, and CASP tools.^20-23

Data Synthesis: Given study heterogeneity, a narrative synthesis was undertaken following Popay et al., grouping findings by prevalence, mechanisms, interventions, and organizational influences.²⁴

Results

Study Selection: The search strategy yielded 976 records. Following the removal of duplicates and screening against eligibility criteria, 89 studies were selected for inclusion. These studies encompass data from approximately 45,000 psychiatric nurses across 28 countries. The detailed selection process, including reasons for exclusion, is presented in the PRISMA 2020 flow diagram (Figure 1).

Figure 1: PRISMA 2020 Flow Diagram

Study Characteristics: A comprehensive summary of the included studies, spanning 28 countries and approximately 45,000 psychiatric nurses, is provided in Table 1.

Table 1: Summary of Included Studies
Parameter	Range / Summary
Total studies reviewed	89
Countries represented	28
Total sample (psychiatric nurses)	≈ 45 000
Study designs	56 % cross-sectional, 22 % RCTs, 14 % qualitative, 8 % mixed methods
Main foci	Sleep quality, burnout, emotional regulation, occupational stress, interventions

Prevalence and Correlates: Large-scale surveys indicated that 38.6% of psychiatric nurses reported poor sleep quality. Mean scores indicated moderate levels of burnout (24.99) and secondary traumatic stress (21.99). During the COVID-19 pandemic, burnout prevalence ranged from 25% to 60%, with PTSD-like symptoms affecting up to 68% of staff.^25-31

Neurobiological Mechanisms: Sleep fragmentation was found to impair prefrontal regulation of stress responses. Chronotype mismatch (e.g., morning types working night shifts) was a predictor for elevated cortisol and burnout.^32-37 Table 2 synthesizes the identified neurobiological pathways linking sleep loss to resilience outcomes.

Table 2: Neurobiological Mechanisms Linking Sleep and Resilience
Mechanism	Evidence Summary	Representative References
HPA-axis dysregulation	Elevated evening cortisol, flattened diurnal rhythm	10, 11, 36
Melatonin suppression due to night work	Reduced secretion, delayed sleep onset	10, 12, 13
Prefrontal–limbic imbalance	Impaired emotion regulation, increased reactivity	32, 33
Inflammatory activation	↑ IL-6, TNF-α correlated with stress indices	37

Interventions

Individual Level: Interventions targeting the individual level primarily focused on biological regulation and psychological coping. Bright-light therapy was found to significantly improve sleep efficiency and alertness among nurses. Psychosocial interventions also proved effective; mindfulness programs reduced burnout (Cohen’s d = –0.58) and enhanced resilience, while cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) yielded moderate to large effects on sleep latency and efficiency.^38-42

Organizational Level: Structural reforms demonstrated substantial impacts on workforce well-being. Shift scheduling adjustments, specifically forward-rotating shifts, lowered sleep complaints by 35%, and limiting consecutive night shifts to a maximum of three was associated with improved recovery. Broader multi-component wellness programs produced large, sustained reductions in burnout. Furthermore, environmental measures, including the installation of circadian lighting, designated rest areas, and noise control protocols, were effective in enhancing alertness.^43-49

A summary of effective multi-level interventions, ranging from individual bright-light therapy to organizational shift-rotation reforms, is detailed in Table 3.

Table 3: Summary of Effective Multi-Level Interventions
Level	Intervention	Reported Outcome	Key References
Individual	Bright-light therapy	↑ Sleep efficiency, ↓ sleepiness	38, 39
Individual	Mindfulness-based training	↓ Burnout, ↑ resilience	40, 41
Individual	CBT-I (shift-adapted)	Improved sleep latency, mood	42
Organizational	Forward-rotating shifts, ≤ 3 nights	↓ Fatigue, ↑ recovery	43, 44
Organizational	Multi-component wellness programs	Sustained burnout reduction	45–47
Environmental	Circadian lighting, rest zones, noise control	↑ Alertness, ↓ errors	48–50

Technological Innovations: Emerging technologies offer novel avenues for supporting workforce resilience. Digital health platforms, wearable biometric sensors, and virtual reality (VR) mindfulness tools have demonstrated both feasibility and high acceptability among mental health staff. These innovations suggest a shift towards personalized, data-driven approaches to monitoring and managing occupational stress in real-time.^50-52

International Context: Cross-national comparisons reveal significant systemic disparities in nurse well-being. Comparative research indicates that burnout rates are notably lower in Nordic healthcare systems, which are characterized by strictly regulated rest periods and mandated staffing ratios. Additionally, cultural orientation—specifically the distinction between collectivist and individualist societal frameworks—was found to influence both the subjective perception of stress and the willingness to engage with resilience interventions.^53-56

Discussion

This review identifies that psychiatric nurses face an intertwined triad of disturbed sleep, emotional dysregulation, and occupational stress that heightens fatigue and burnout risk. While previous reviews have established high rates of burnout in general nursing populations (e.g., medical-surgical units), our findings highlight a vulnerability specific to psychiatric nursing: the bidirectional relationship between sleep fragmentation and the intense emotional labor required for crisis management. As hypothesized in the Neuro-circadian Disruption Framework, the bidirectional relationships between circadian rhythmicity, emotional processing, and occupational stress form a reinforcing cycle of vulnerability (Figure 2).

The Neuro-circadian Disruption Framework: Unlike general studies that often treat sleep and stress as separate variables, our synthesis supports the Neuro-circadian Disruption Framework. This model suggests that biological rhythm misalignment fundamentally erodes the cognitive reserves needed for emotional regulation. As illustrated in Figure 2, the relationships between circadian rhythmicity, emotional processing, and occupational stress form a self-perpetuating cycle of vulnerability.

Our analysis confirms that neuro-circadian imbalance may erode therapeutic engagement, heightening vulnerability to compassion fatigue. This aligns with recent findings on workforce wellness but emphasizes that traditional initiatives focused solely on self-care are insufficient. Instead, evidence supports occupational health resilience as a dynamic interaction between personal adaptability and organizational context.^57-59

Conclusions

Neuro-circadian disruption, emotional dysregulation, and occupational stress constitute a self-perpetuating cycle that undermines psychiatric nurses’ well-being and performance. Evidence supports a multilevel intervention model combining circadian aligned scheduling, mindfulness, cognitive behavioral approaches, and organizational reform. Sustaining this critical workforce demands urgent translation of neuroscientific and psychosocial knowledge into practice and policy. A culture that values recovery, emotional safety, and biological rhythm alignment is essential to safeguard the resilience of psychiatric nursing worldwide.

Implications for Practice: The findings of this review underscore the necessity of translating neuro-circadian principles into clinical operations. To mitigate biological rhythm disruption, healthcare administrators should implement circadian-informed scheduling practices, specifically utilize forward-rotating rosters and limit the number of consecutive night shifts. At the environmental level, psychiatric wards require redesigning to include dedicated rest spaces, low-noise zones, and adaptive lighting systems to support staff recovery. Furthermore, targeted interventions such as workplace bright-light therapy for nocturnal staff and scalable mindfulness or CBT-based programs should be made accessible to enhance individual resilience. Finally, to ensure early identification of at-risk staff, routine screening for sleep quality and occupational stress should be embedded into standard occupational health assessments.

Policy Implications: At the regulatory level, there is an urgent need to develop national occupational health standards specifically tailored to the unique demands of psychiatric nursing. Policymakers should enforce evidence-based regulations regarding rest periods and shift limits to prevent chronic fatigue. Additionally, to prepare the future workforce, educational bodies must integrate comprehensive content on resilience, sleep health, and stress management into both undergraduate nursing curricula and continuing education frameworks.

Research Gaps and Future Directions: To advance the field beyond current cross-sectional associations, future investigations should employ longitudinal designs to establish causality between sleep disruption and emotional dysregulation. There is also a critical need for studies utilizing neurobiological biomarkers and implementation science to evaluate the long-term sustainability of interventions. Moreover, the integration of wearable sensors and ecological momentary assessment methods offers a promising avenue to clarify the precise temporal dynamics of sleep-stress interactions in real-world clinical settings

Ethical Considerations: This review analyzed previously published data; ethical approval and informed consent were not required.

Author Contributions: The author conceived and designed the review, performed the literature search, extracted and synthesized data, and wrote and approved the final manuscript.

Funding: No specific funding was received for this study.

Conflicts of Interest: The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

1. Labrague LJ. Psychological resilience, coping behaviors and social support among health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review of quantitative studies. J Nurs Manag. 2021;29(7):1893–1905. doi:10.1111/jonm.13336

1. Yang J, Chen Y, Tian Y, et al. Risk factors and consequences of mental health problems in nurses: a scoping review of cohort studies. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2024;33(4):1021–1039. doi:10.1111/inm.13337

1. Pignata S, Bezak E, Childs J. Workplace interventions to improve well-being and reduce burnout for nurses, physicians and allied healthcare professionals: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2023;13(6): e071203. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071203

1. Aloufi AA. Professional quality of life for psychiatric nurses in Saudi Arabia. J Posthumanism. 2025;5(6):234–249. doi:10.63332/joph. v5i6.2537

1. Inchingolo AD, Inchingolo AM, Fatone MC, et al. Guidelines for reducing the adverse effects of shift work on nursing staff: a systematic review. Healthcare (Basel). 2025;13(17):2148. doi:10.3390/healthcare13172148

1. Bianchi, R., & Sowden, J. F. (2024). Five decades of debate on burnout.‏ https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.52512

1. Bride, B. E. (2007). Prevalence of secondary traumatic stress among social workers. Social work, 52(1), 63-70.‏ https://doi.org/10.1093/SW/52.1.63

1. Paulus, F. W., Ohmann, S., Möhler, E., Plener, P., & Popow, C. (2021). Emotional dysregulation in children and adolescents with psychiatric disorders. A narrative review. Frontiers in psychiatry, 12, 628252.‏ https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.628252

1. Ong, A. D., & Cammarata, C. (2020). Resilience theory of, not just the trait dimension. The Wiley Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences: Models and Theories, 357-361.‏ https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118970843.ch59

1. Zhao H, Li Q, Huang H, et al. Circadian rhythm types and shift work demands shape sleep quality and depressive symptoms in shift-working nurses. Front Public Health. 2025; 13:1667778. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1667778

1. Li L, Wang X, Bai C, et al. Factors associated with chronotype, job burnout, and perceived stress among nurses in Chinese tertiary hospitals: a multicenter cross-sectional study. Chronobiol Int. 2024;41(7):956–967. doi:10.1080/07420528.2024.2373224

1. Pan X, Wang J, Zhang KR, et al. Characterizing potential subtypes and influencing factors of sleep quality in psychiatric nurses by latent profile analysis. J Nurs Manag. 2024; 2024:3842592. doi:10.1155/2024/3842592

1. Dong Z, Chen Y, Cao J, et al. The mediating effect of shift sleep disorder on work–family conflict and burnout among shift nurses. Res Sq. 2025. doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-6826100/v1

1. Pehlivan Saribudak, T., & Çalişkan, B. B. (2025). ‘I Was too Tired to Show Compassion’: A Phenomenological Qualitative Study on the Lived Compassion Fatigue Experiences of Nurses Working in Acute Inpatient Psychiatric Units. Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing, 32(2), 352-363.‏ https://doi.org/10.1111/jpm.13114

1. O’Connor E, Prebble K, Waterworth S. Organisational factors to optimise mental health nurses’ wellbeing in the workplace: an integrative literature review. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2023;32(6):1456–1472. doi:10.1111/inm.13218

1. Bui M, McInnes E, Ennis G, et al. Mental health nurses’ experience of resilience during COVID-19: a qualitative inquiry. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2023;32(6):1445–1455. doi:10.1111/inm.13213

1. Bekelepi N, Martin PD. Support interventions for nurses working in acute psychiatric units: a systematic review. Health SA Gesondheid. 2022; 27:1811. doi:10.4102/hsag. v27i0.1811

1. Rushton, C. H., Batcheller, J., Schroeder, K., & Donohue, P. (2015). Burnout and resilience among nurses practicing in high-intensity settings. American journal of critical care, 24(5), 412-420.‏ https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2015291

1. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372: n71. doi:10.1136/bmj. n71

1. Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G, et al. AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomized or non-randomized studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ. 2017;358: j4008. doi:10.1136/bmj. j4008

1. Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials. BMJ. 2019;366: l4898. doi:10.1136/bmj. l4898

1. Wells GA, Shea B, O’Connell D, et al. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomized Studies in Meta-Analyses. Ottawa Hospital Research Institute; 2013.

1. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP). CASP Qualitative Checklist. Oxford: CASP UK; 2018. Available from: https://casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists/

1. Popay J, Roberts H, Sowden A, et al. Guidance on the Conduct of Narrative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews. Lancaster University; 2006.

1. Lyu XL, Li K, Qin L, et al. Sleep status of psychiatric nurses: a survey from China. Nurs Open. 2021;8(4):1923–1932. doi:10.1002/nop2.972

1. Zhang Y, Murphy J, Lammers-van der Holst HM, et al. Interventions to improve the sleep of nurses: a systematic review. Res Nurs Health. 2023;46(5):456–474. doi:10.1002/nur.22337

1. Ko H, Shim J, Baek J. Effects of programs on sleep improvement in shift-work nurses: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Nurs. 2025; 24:813. doi:10.1186/s12912-025-03813-3

1. Al-Hammouri MM, Rababah JA, Al-Jdeetawey NA. How shift schedules shape nurses’ sleep and compassion: a comparative study. Int Nurs Rev. 2025;72(3):456–467. doi:10.1111/inr.70085

1. Lobo R, Kumar SP, Tm R. Professional quality of life among mental health nurses: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2024;33(2):234–249.

1. Koştu N, Inci FH, Arslan S. Compassion fatigue and meaning in life as predictors of secondary traumatic stress in nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Nurs Pract. 2024;30(2): e13249. doi:10.1111/ijn.13249

1. Yazid J, Chik AB, Yusop YBM. Sleep quality and psychological outcomes among shift nurses working in hospitals: a systematic review. J Holist Nurs Sci. 2025;12(2):145–162. doi:10.31603/jhns. v12i2.13376

1. Hsieh HF, Liu Y, Hsu HT, et al. Relations between stress and depressive symptoms in psychiatric nurses: the mediating effects of sleep quality and occupational burnout. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(14):7327. doi:10.3390/ijerph18147327

1. Yin M, Li WQ, Yang Q, et al. The mediating role of coping style in the relationship between sleep quality and burnout: a cross-sectional study among psychiatric nurses. Front Psychiatry. 2022; 13:926040. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2022.926040

1. Pan X, Wang J, Zhang KR, et al. Characterizing potential subtypes and influencing factors of sleep quality in psychiatric nurses by latent profile analysis. J Nurs Manag. 2024; 2024:3842592. doi:10.1155/2024/3842592

1. Albakri U, Smeets NWJ, Drotos E, et al. Sleep quality and the need for recovery among nurses working irregular shifts: a cross-sectional study. Work. 2024;68(2):567–578. doi:10.3233/wor-230500

1. López-Soto P, Fabbian F, Cappadona R, et al. Chronotype, nursing activity, and gender: a systematic review. J Adv Nurs. 2018;74(6):1349–1365. doi:10.1111/jan.13548

1. Assis DC, Resende DV, Marziale MH. Association between shift work, salivary cortisol levels, stress and fatigue in nurses: integrative review. Rev Bras Enferm. 2018;71(Suppl 1):645–653. doi:10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0482

1. Bragge P, Burns J, Kellner P, et al. Sleep health interventions for managing mental health in shift workers: a systematic review. medRxiv. 2025. doi:10.1101/2025.07.28.25331984

1. van Maanen A, Meijer A, van der Heijden KB, Oort F. The effects of light therapy on sleep problems: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sleep Med Rev. 2016; 29:52–62. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2015.08.002

1. Wang Q, Luan Y, Liu D, et al. Guided self-help mindfulness-based intervention for increasing psychological resilience and reducing job burnout in psychiatric nurses: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Nurs Pract. 2023;29(6): e13204. doi:10.1111/ijn.13204

1. Ong NY, Teo FJJ, Ee JZY, et al. Effectiveness of mindfulness-based interventions on the well-being of healthcare workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gen Psychiatry. 2024;37(4): e101163. doi:10.1136/gpsych-2023-101163

1. Larsson M, Ho DM, Kirschner M, Seifritz E, Manoliu A. Digital resilience interventions for healthcare workers: a systematic review. Front Psychiatry. 2025; 16:1234567. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1234567

1. Moen LV, Lie JAS, Sterud T, et al. Association of non-standard working time arrangements with safety incidents: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2025;15(3): e087654.

1. Harris R, Kavaliotis E, Drummond SPA, Wolkow A. Sleep, mental health and physical health in new shift workers transitioning to shift work: systematic review and meta-analysis. Sleep Med Rev. 2024; 72:1019–1035.

1. Kim J, Kwon R, Yun H, et al. The association between long working hours, shift work, and suicidal ideation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2024;50(2):145–162. doi:10.5271/sjweh.4115

1. Zhang H, Xia Z, Yu S, et al. Interventions for compassion fatigue, burnout, and secondary traumatic stress in nurses: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Nurs Health Sci. 2024;26(3): e70042. doi:10.1111/nhs.70042

1. Aust B, Leduc C, Cresswell-Smith J, et al. The effects of different types of organizational workplace mental health interventions on mental health and wellbeing in healthcare workers: a systematic review. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2024;97(1):1–15. doi:10.1007/s00420-023-01944-6

1. Kiratipaisarl W, Surawattanasakul V, Sirikul W. Individual and organizational interventions to reduce burnout in resident physicians: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24(1):144. doi:10.1186/s12909-024-04932-3

1. Noise reduction strategies in healthcare settings. Appl Acoust. 2024; 198:109456. doi: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2023.109456

1. Shreffler J, Petrey J, Huecker M. The impact of COVID-19 on healthcare worker wellness: a scoping review. West J Emerg Med. 2020;21(5):1059–1066. doi:10.5811/westjem.2020.5.47970

1. Saragih ID, Tonapa SI, Saragih IS, et al. Global prevalence of mental health problems among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2021; 121:104002. Doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.104002

1. Gray P, Senabe S, Naicker N, et al. Workplace-based organizational interventions promoting mental health and happiness among healthcare workers: a realist review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(23):4736. doi:10.3390/ijerph16234736

1. Cohen C, Pignata S, Bezak E, Tie M, Childs J. Workplace interventions to improve well-being and reduce burnout for healthcare professionals: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2023;13(6): e071203. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071203

1. Kruse C, Betancourt AJ, Gonzales M, et al. Leveraging mobile health to manage mental health/behavioral health disorders: systematic literature review. JMIR Ment Health. 2022;9(1): e31569. doi:10.2196/31569

1. Anger W, Dimoff J, Alley L. Addressing health care workers’ mental health: a systematic review of evidence-based interventions and current resources. Am J Public Health. 2024;114(S2): S213–S226. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2024.307470

1. Kruse C, Betancourt AJ, Gonzales M, Dickerson K, Neer M. Leveraging mobile health to manage mental health and behavioral health disorders: a systematic review. JMIR Ment Health. 2022;9(1): e31569. doi:10.2196/31569

1. Cocker, F., & Joss, N. (2016). Compassion fatigue among healthcare, emergency and community service workers: A systematic review. International journal of environmental research and public health, 13(6), 618.‏ https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13060618

1. Sinclair, S., Raffin-Bouchal, S., Venturato, L., Mijovic-Kondejewski, J., & Smith-MacDonald, L. (2017). Compassion fatigue: A meta-narrative review of the healthcare literature. International journal of nursing studies, 69, 9-24.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.01.003

1. Kelly, L. (2020). Burnout, compassion fatigue, and secondary trauma in nurses: Recognizing the occupational phenomenon and personal consequences of caregiving. Critical Care Nursing Quarterly, 43(1), 73-80.‏ https://doi.org/10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000293