Evaluating the effectiveness of McKenzie vs. Myofascial release techniques for cervical radiculopathy: A Brief Review Amandeep Bhana1, Ajanti Indora2, Paras Jaiya3, Ishani Sinha4 1Assistant Professor, Department of Physiotherapy, Guru Kashi University, Talwandi Sabo, Bathinda, Punjab 2Student M.P.Th Neurology, College of Physiotherapy, Pt. B.D. Sharma University of Health Sciences, Rohtak , India 3Student M.P.Th Sports, College of Physiotherapy,

Abstract

Neck pain is a prevalent condition that leads to significant discomfort, disability, and economic burden. Cervical radiculopathy (CR), a neurologic disorder caused by cervical nerve root compression due to herniated discs, spondylosis, or osteophytosis, often presents with radiating pain, sensory disturbances, and motor weakness in the upper extremity. While spinal manipulation and mobilization are common treatment approaches, some patients may require alternative interventions. The McKenzie Method, widely used for spinal disorders,focuses on mechanical diagnosis and therapy through directional preference exercises that promote centralization of symptoms. On the other hand, Myofascial Release (MFR) targets myofascial trigger points, which are frequently observed in patients with cervical radiculopathy, and has been shown to alleviate pain and improve functional mobility. Despite the effectiveness of both techniques, there is a lack of comparative studies evaluating their outcomes in cervical radiculopathy management. This study aims to investigate and compare the therapeutic effects of the McKenzie Method and Myofascial Release techniques in individuals with cervical radiculopathy, assessing their impact on pain reduction, functional improvement, and overall patient outcomes. The findings of this study may provide valuable insights into optimizing treatment strategies for cervical radiculopathy, ultimately enhancing clinical decision-making and patient care.