Abstract
Background and Aims: Delivering quality nursing care is an important priority for nursing heads worldwide. This study explored the perceptions of head nurses regarding factors affecting the quality of nursing care in the Riyadh region. Methods: This cross-sectional study used a convenience sampling technique to randomly select head nurses from 10 hospitals (n≤220). Eligible participants were asked to complete a 22-item online questionnaire on socio-demographics and rated factors affecting the quality of nursing care on a 5-point Likert scale. Data analysis was conducted using descriptive statistics and bivariate (two-tailed) Pearson’s correlations with SPSS software (version 27.0). Results: This study included 176 head nurses, mostly males (65.3%), aged 30 or older (73.9%), married (57.4%), with a bachelor’s in nursing (43.2%), and extensive nursing and leadership experience. Significant positive associations were observed between age and marital status (p≤0.027), education level (p<0.001), years of nursing practice (p<0.001), and years of nurse leadership (p<0.001). Key factors impacting nursing care quality included work experience (mean, standard deviation [SD]: 3.040 [1.341]), satisfaction (3.006 [1.263]), and work-related burnout (3.006 [1.320]). Workload, resources, location, and language barriers had minimal impact. Conclusions: This study found a significant association between socio-demographic factors and the quality of nursing care. Head nurses perceived that work experience, satisfaction, and work-related burnout were the key factors affecting the quality of nursing care. Furthermore, organizational support was key to improving the quality of nursing care. Collaboration between government and facility managers may serve as a potential approach to improving nursing care standards in the Riyadh region.
Keywords: Factors · head nurses’ perception · quality of nursing care · Riyadh region
References
- 1.De Raeve P, Davidson PM, Bergs J, Patch M, Jack SM, Castro-Ayala A, 48 Majmaah Journal of Health Sciences,Vol.13, Issue2,April-2025,Shawwal-1446 Head Nurses’Perceptions of Factors AffectingQualityofNursingCareintheRiyadhRegion:ACross-sectionalStudy et al. Advanced practice nursing in Europe-Results from a pan-European survey of 35 countries. J Adv Nurs. 2024;80(1):377–386.
- 2.Liu Y,Aungsuroch Y.Factors influencing nurse-assessed quality nursing care: A cross-sectional study in hospitals. J Adv Nurs. 2018;74(4):935–945.
- 3.GohML,AngEN,ChanYH,HeHG, Vehviläinen-Julkunen K. A descriptive quantitative study on multi-ethnic patient satisfaction with nursing care measured by the Revised Humane Caring Scale. Appl Nurs Res. 2016;31:126–131.
- 4.Buchanan J,Dawkins P,Lindo JL.Satisfaction with nursing care in the emergency department of an urban hospital in the developing world: A pilot study. Int Emerg Nurs.2015;23(3):218–224.
- 5.Alsaqri S. Patient satisfaction with quality of nursing care at governmental hospitals, Ha’il City, Saudi Arabia. JBAH. 2016;6(10):128–142.
- 6.Karaca A,Durna Z.Patient satisfaction with the quality of nursing care. Nurs Open. 2019;6(2):535–545.
- 7.Weldetsadik AY, Gishu T, Tekleab AM, Asfaw YM, Legesse TG, Demas T. Quality of nursing care and nurses’ working environment in Ethiopia: Nurses’and physicians’perception.Int J Afr Nurs Sci. 2019;10:131–135.
- 8.Zin TP, Abhicharttibutra K, Wichaikum OA. Factors predicting quality of nursing care among registered nurses in Myanmar: A cross-sectional study. Pacific Rim Int J Nurs Res. 2023;28(3):496–508.
- 9.Khan A, Muhammad D. Perspective of nurses regarding factors affecting quality of nursing care in intensive care units: A qualitative study. Rehman J Health Sci. 2022;4(2):121–130. 10.Xue X, Kunaviktikul W, Abhicharttibutra K, Wichaikhum OA. Causal modelling of factors influencing quality of nursing care in China. PRIJNR [Internet]. 2023;27(3):417–430. 11.Abdallah SAE,Mostafa SAM.The influence of head nurses’leading role and assertiveness on staff nurses’ achievement motivation: A comparative study. Egypt J Health Care. 2021;12(3):690–
Peer review
Peer reviewed by 4 reviewers, who chose to remain anonymous.